<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SoapBoxRants - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-6593de02" type="application/json"/><link>http://sbr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://sbr.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:30:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: succint</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2005/11/09/succint/#comment-576398755</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So too do I see you, Wordslinger.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beanpeterwiggin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:30:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mac Pro vs Dell Precision</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2008/05/07/mac-pro-vs-dell-precision/#comment-136570794</link><description>&lt;p&gt;PS, Apple will also work with you on the price point, especially for the Mac Pro customers.  They don't budge much on their consumer models, but the Mac Pro they WILL work with you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fieryhail</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 04:51:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mac Pro vs Dell Precision</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2008/05/07/mac-pro-vs-dell-precision/#comment-136570442</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I own a Mac Pro 2,1 (2x 3GHz) and am extremely pleased.  I have used Precision machines before, and they do not seem to have the same performance.  The only thing I can think of is the OS, OS X 10.6.x is rock-solid, and on equivalent hardware, faster than Win 7 x64.  The downside is that with my model, I have the EFI32 not the EFI64.  Which means that I can not boot a ntive 64-bit Snow Leopard kernel, however, I have no difficulty running 64-bit apps.  When 32GB RAM becomes a limiting factor, I will either look at upgrading my MacPro to 64GB (unsupported by Apple of course) or looking into the 12-core MacPro which handles 64GB nicely and SHOULD handle ever more.  HP's, I find to be overpriced for what you get, no arguments there.  Very informative writeup, and non-biased which OI also like.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fieryhail</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 04:49:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mac Pro vs Dell Precision</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2008/05/07/mac-pro-vs-dell-precision/#comment-105898392</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem with that is there is no way to quantify the amount of discount. It really depends on the deals available, the rep you get, quantity ordered, and many other factors. I felt the best way to do a comparison would be to work strictly off list prices from their sites. I do think, though, now that you have mentioned it that I should have put a "YMMV" disclaimer for discounts/sales/etc. It's also time I do a new set of comparisons.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:32:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mac Pro vs Dell Precision</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2008/05/07/mac-pro-vs-dell-precision/#comment-105764330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Um you guys are leaving out the important part on the price/purchase system. On the dell you can call a rep and have the price slashed by a much bigger factor. The dell will ALWAYS ALWAYS be cheaper. &lt;a href="http://Systemshootouts.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;Systemshootouts.org&lt;/a&gt; was always off, this comparison is much more fair. Just missing the part where anyone buying a precision or server calls a rep and gets a deal. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tex</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:54:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Tobacco &amp;#8211; Little Minds (an e-cig story)</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2010/03/20/big-tobacco-little-minds-an-e-cig-story/#comment-68777465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We often neglect the excise tax revenues generated by analogs.  I think that I read that the feds have collected over 77 billion dollars the last 10 years and that doesn't include state excise and sale tax revenues.  I'm more inclined to believe that our government will let us kill ourselves with analogs rather than give up the tax money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:24:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Business Care(less)</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2008/07/02/att-business-careless/#comment-65608747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How are the beds made? Elliotts Designs iron beds start off as heavy gauge steel tube and rod. They then cut and bend all of the material at the time an order is placed. Once the materials are cut it is then taken to the foundry and their special blend of Aluminum is used for the castings. Once the bed is poured, it is then inspected. The bed is then hand filed and once again inspected. After filing, the bed is then sent through the roto-blast machine where the surface of the bed is preped for painting. The bed is then sent through the paint line where it is inspected before it is painted. Once painted and cooled, the bed is inspected once more before heading to packing if it is a one step finish. If it is a premium finish the bed is then inspected and sent to Duratique where the bed is hand painted, inspected, cured and then sent to the packaging department. The bed is inspected one final time and foamed and boxed. Why does Elliott s Designs inspect the bed so much? They want to be sure you receive the highest quality bed available.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">buy youtube views</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:34:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Women Are Frustrating</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2010/01/02/women-are-frustrating/#comment-54729184</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, considering the theme of your comments on my posts, I am going to guess you've had some bad experiences. I'm also going to go out on a limb and say you've decided that perpetuating the stereotype of men only after one thing is the only way to find what you believe is happiness. I've touched real joy and fulfillment. I hope to find myself there again. I cannot make you see my point of view, but I know there is better out there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've known many great women that are not at all how you described. I know the men they eventually settled down with. I can assure you that they aren't all as cold as you think. But this is, of course, all a matter of perspective. I know how you can feel the way you do because I've been there. Then I saw something different. I hope that you also get a chance to see things the way I do now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:32:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Women Are Frustrating</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2010/01/02/women-are-frustrating/#comment-54714704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Women are not interested in "nice guys". They want good-looking, rich men who will support and pamper them, and that is ALL they want.  Women dont really care what is on your mind, and they accuse us of thinking about  only "one thing" to justify their failure to look beneath the surface.  Women dont care what is in your heart, just what is in your wallet. (The money, not the condom.) They are all superficial, shallow, gold-digging harpies, and you are probably better of without them.  So, enjoy yourself. See how many one-night-stands you can have before senility and impotence set in.  After all, if you cant earn thier loyalty, why do they deserve yours?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:59:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Peregrination and Revelation</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2008/11/23/peregrination-and-revelation/#comment-54609945</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, I believe it is the other way around. Assumptions like yours are the problem. I do not believe that a "successful" relationship is one where it is based on a desire for wealth, power, or material possessions. Now, don't get me wrong. I think you should have a good job and be able to pay your bills with at least some money left over for enjoyment...but that in itself should not be a driving goal nor should it be the basis of a relationship if it is to be truly fulfilling.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Besides, who says I can't be a "free thinker" and still be successful in terms of occupation and finance? And for the record, my appearance gets more than a few compliments...but then good hygiene isn't something to skimp on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The point I was making is that you have to set aside all of the assumptions that you so kindly stated in your post. Those very things undermine the foundations of a deep, strong, fulfilling relationship. They mute the voice that is the core of yourself. The first step is to learn to listen all over again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:26:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Peregrination and Revelation</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2008/11/23/peregrination-and-revelation/#comment-54604859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that you are operating under a faulty assumption. You seem to think that people with open minds who are always trying to improve themselves stand a better chance of having  successful relationships. In my experiance, women are not interested in "nice guys". They are attracted to good looks and money, AND THAT IS ALL!!! They are not interested in what is in your heart. They dont care what kind of deep thoughts you have. How you look and how much money you have are their primary concerns.  So stop wasting your time being a "free thinker", get a good job that pays well, and do whatever you can to improve your appearence. The only "nice guys" in successful relationships are the ones with lots of money and looks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:08:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Cannot Call Myself A Frugalista</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2009/09/23/i-cannot-call-myself-a-frugalista/#comment-18525890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am now the Artist Formerly Known as Jackson Frugalista.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I caved and changed the name — my “buy cool stuff cheap” blog is now &lt;a href="http://frugalmississippi.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://frugalmississippi.blogs...&lt;/a&gt;. I ma looking forward to posting info about garage sales in Pelahatchie, MS, without the threat of a lawsuit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;THAT SAID — I am not willing to let the issue die. So I created a second new blog, “Really Dumb Trademarks.” Its address is &lt;a href="http://reallydumbtrademark.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://reallydumbtrademark.blo...&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I CAN’T believe I am the only person this has happened to — other people have had their online freedom of speech cut off because of some ridiculous trademark filing. I’d like us all to have a place to go and vent.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I also want to post resources for site visitors who wish to fight the fight.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ideally, this new blog will catch the attention of some organization that works to protect individuals’ rights online. If I can get someone like that interested, I’d like to see all the people who offered ME money to help in a fight against Trademark Girl in Miami direct those funds to a larger effort to make trademarks work fairly for everyone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Those of you who have spoken out on the plain craziness of this trademark, I hope you’ll stay interested in the topic. Maybe we can continue to make some noise, get some things changed, and then I CAN CHANGE MY NAME BACK. And laugh maniacally towards the general direction of Miami.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JacksonFrugalGal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 19:44:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Cannot Call Myself A Frugalista</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2009/09/23/i-cannot-call-myself-a-frugalista/#comment-17333492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Honestly, the tool-that-shall-not-be-named needs to get a clue and drop this idiocy. I'm really hoping this thing gets enough media attention that she pretty much has to let the mark go.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:48:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Don&amp;#8217;t Own Words Like Frugalista</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2009/09/18/i-dont-own-words-like-frugalista/#comment-17265131</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well you have a friend in this fight. I can't abide stupidity and this is the biggest I've seen lately. I mentioned it on your latest blog post but I'll say it here as well...don't just throw in the towel. See if you can stall for more time...it's what a lawyer would do while researching things. Meanwhile, keep trying to get in touch with people and groups that might be able to help.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'll see if I can get any advice from my lawyer friends and I'll drop you a note if I get anything.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:16:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Cannot Call Myself A Frugalista</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2009/09/23/i-cannot-call-myself-a-frugalista/#comment-17264885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks much for the support.  The post is great, I needed that!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jacksonfrugalista</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:11:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Don&amp;#8217;t Own Words Like Frugalista</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2009/09/18/i-dont-own-words-like-frugalista/#comment-17015085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the commentary.  This whole thing has been ridiculous.  I can't afford the cost of fighting this via the courts or the Trademark Office, but I hope that people talking about it will give the trademark people cause to think the next time something like this comes before them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have NO HOPE that the markholder will change her tune, so JacksonFrugalista will become JacksonSomethingElse by the end of the month.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you want to read my objections to the mark, based on my reading of trademark law, please go to the blog -- &lt;a href="http://jacksonfrugalista.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://jacksonfrugalista.wordp...&lt;/a&gt; -- and see it.  I think the argument is sound, as do the attorneys I have shown it to.  Maybe someone will take it and do something useful with it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jacksonfrugalista</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:32:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Tilt Software</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2007/11/29/att-tilt-software/#comment-14804541</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can't. Sprint uses a CDMA network while AT&amp;amp;T uses a GSM network. These technologies are not compatible with one another. The only other carrier in the USA to use GSM is T-Mobile so that would be the only place you could move to with your Tilt.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On a side note, CDMA is pretty much only used in the USA. The majority of the world uses GSM.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:57:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Tilt Software</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2007/11/29/att-tilt-software/#comment-14781042</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to change my tilt over to sprint how can I do that?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ronald</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:18:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Reboot a Franchise</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2009/05/09/how-to-reboot-a-franchise/#comment-10161240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This post really make laugh. At first I find it very serious and suddenly I realize how he describe some actors like Quinto "Sylar of Heroes". I never notice that he has a pointed ears.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Urlaub in Spanien</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:16:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MacGyver Phone?</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2007/08/27/macgyver-phone/#comment-9963535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With a HardSPL'd WinMo phone you can do much more than with a stock WinMo phone as well. The article is old...pre 2nd gen iPhone as a matter of fact and you have to admit that OS 1.x and the original hardware was terrible for business use (not to mention the lack of the app store). I actually have a 2nd gen iPhone and have given up the TyTNII. The point of the article at the time was that the WinMo phone offered much more to business users than the original iPhone. And let's be honest, how many people are going to hack the OS on their business supplied phone?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:33:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MacGyver Phone?</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2007/08/27/macgyver-phone/#comment-9958208</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually an Iphone can open microsoft documents,apps, and if you are jailbroken you can download torrents and do waaay more. HTC sucks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HTC sucks</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:09:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Support - We&amp;#8217;re People Too</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2009/04/30/tech-support-were-people-too/#comment-9835048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been on both sides and I can't say that one side has it worse than the other. While it's true we get a lot of calls, not all of them are bad. While on the other side of the coin, if you are calling it's probably because something bad has happened. I think it kind of balances out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:02:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Support - We&amp;#8217;re People Too</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2009/04/30/tech-support-were-people-too/#comment-9792818</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So true, we customers should show / practice some courtesy when calling CSR or TSRs because they are human too :) these people answer hundred of calls daily making them tired and stressed too. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Finca Mallorca	</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:49:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Castigations and Plagues</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2008/04/07/castigations-and-plagues/#comment-7710037</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Morality is not related to believe a god or not, but deal with what we do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PDFoxy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 05:42:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Tilt Software</title><link>http://soapboxrants.net/2007/11/29/att-tilt-software/#comment-7579958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;how did you get rid of it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:21:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>